Let
me preface. I have no agenda. This is not a conspiracy. This is a concerned
voter sharing information with the powers that be about what they can do to get
done what they can get done. Likely what will happen, as has been done before
and is already being schemed about, is that “cuts that hurt” will be made so
that voters will be much more obligated to pass a school levy [And indeed I was
correct, as the proposal if the May 2014 vote fails is that, under the pretense
of saving money, the elementary schools will be rearranged by grade in two
divided areas. This would allow a handful of positions to be cut, but would
cost significantly more in transitioning and in busing. Might this just be a
way to punish another failure?] It is true that those who do not have kids in
the district are more likely to vote no on a levy. It is also true that those who have an
interest, such as working for the district, will most certainly vote yes. Point
being, all humans serve their own interests, so don’t play yourself off as
exempt.
I
attended Franklin City Schools my entire life. I enjoyed this experience, and
would not have wanted it any other way. I could not imagine my life any other
way than having grown up in this city and this school district. What it has
given me is much, both in connections to hundreds of wonderful people, and in a
good education. Not one that compares to wealthy districts, but it got the job
done. I harbor no bitterness, and I have not voted no due to bitterness, but
due to the reality of the situation around us.
That
being said, if I did not just alienate many of these people, I may in the
ensuing essay. This is far from my intention. It is my desire to help you see
where I am coming from, and many others are coming from, rather than get in an
argument on Facebook or at a football game. This is one of few opinions I have
kept to myself due to it being, literally, close to home. However, after
reading dozens of comments, clearly not thought through, bashing and defaming
any “stupid”, “ignorant”, etc. person who would dare “vote against our kids”
has moved me to stand up for the MAJORITY of Franklin who begs to differ. Such
ad hominem arguments and fallacies strewn into one sentence is impressive due
to the lack of effort required. Why would anyone vote against kids? Rather,
there are so many legitimate reasons to vote against our levy. Play it off as
hating children or education; clearly those of you who cannot use the correct
form of “too” or in various other ways have taken the metaphorical chainsaw to
your grammar and syntax are not benefitting from the current education, and are
not making an impressive case for further funding.
Taxes
are almost exclusively the argument brought up when it comes to any levy, with
this being no exception. Indeed this tax increase will be difficult for many.
Those that have owned homes for years and are currently in hard times (or on
permanent fixed incomes, such as those pesky senior citizens) find it hard to
budget the extra money necessary to pay for such a levy. But, since precious
little of you have had any economics training, it goes beyond that effect. When
owners of rental properties (which are large in number and growing in Franklin)
are taxed, that tax is often then placed on low income renters. Not everyone
has solid employment, including solid employment with the very institution they
are sending the money to. Empathizing with others and seeing where they are
coming from, even if it does not change your position, is a very powerful thing
in politics. Perhaps you should try it.
“But
this isn’t political.” Isn’t it? How many are aware of this is unknown. It was
not hard to see as an informed and alert (I mean, “ignorant”, “stupid”, scary
future generation- I couldn’t get that exact quote because it was quickly
deleted) student that there is an obvious spoils system throughout the Franklin
school district. I will not mention specific instances, not because I do not
have a plethora, but because that would simply be too personal. [I now relent
from that. At the recent opening for athletic director and head football coach,
there were plenty of outside applicants. But from the very beginning I
predicted, correctly, who would get the jobs. Not that I have a problem with
the individuals in the position; on the contrary, I don’t mind them. But it is
yet another example of refusing to look at someone outside of this circle.]
Nonetheless, nowadays, it is almost a must that one must be a Franklin graduate
to be hired at Franklin, unless it is a position that requires special skills.
But being a Franklin grad is not enough; one must have connections. If you do,
by all means apply; regardless of your qualifications you will likely be hired.
If you do not, don’t spend the ink to print a résumé. I have seen this issue
with my mother, who with subbing experience and a master’s degree was several
times passed over for candidates straight out of college with bachelor’s
degrees. I have also seen it with a Franklin graduate who did not have the
connections that another did, though she was a valedictorian (as was yours truly,
if that increases my credibility at all). You say, “See, you are bitter.” No, I
am not. It is sad that this is where we are at. We can’t reach outside of our
cliques. But my mother is happy with where she is at. Having a retired father
and unemployed mother taught me how to survive on less. (Situations like these
cannot afford levies.) I’m not sure where this corruption started, or why it is
believed it is okay, but this, far more than any levy failure, is “hurting our
kids”. We are not choosing the most qualified candidates, but the most beloved,
the most known to others. Instead of having principals hire teachers, decisions
have before been left up to coworkers, other teachers, who can determine who
they would most enjoy to have in the lounge with them. This sells short
students and taxpayers, who trust the schools to give them the best education
possible. They do not care if the teachers can go have a beer together on the
weekend. They want to be educated. Give them that education. It does not start
with a levy. You simply do not demand a levy and expect taxpayers to trust you
with their ADDITIONAL money. You earn their trust, provide the education, and
if the time comes that you truly need more money, they will provide. If they do
not, I will be unhappy with you, though not in a bitter, angry, irrational way.
While
on the topic, another thing that hurts the kids is the terrible example set
from the school board down in trying to sneak levies through. It has happened
several times, the last time being this past August, 2013. Deny it all you
want. It was not advertised. It was published once in a general article in the Middletown Journal. The chances of
seeing that is low. It might have been in the Chronicle, but it rarely has Franklin news, so from what I hear its
circulation is pretty low. There were few, if any signs put out, contrary to
last time. I worked at a polling place in the library. My precinct had a 9%
turnout, higher than the precinct on the other side with a 7% turnout. Many
said that they had just heard about the levy the day before when their friend
called them. Some even said that they just saw the “voting today” signs out and
came in. This was not advertised. The desire was that supporters would go and
vote, being aware of the levy, and that those who would not support would stay
ignorant of it and not show up. This is unethical; it is wrong. Thankfully, it
backfired.
Further
proving itself unable to be trusted with taxpayer money, Franklin schools has
its priorities backwards. “It’s for the kids. You must not care about the
kids.” If you cared about the kids, you would channel the funds you have toward
them. Instead, you have funneled much of this money into the athletic programs,
at the expense of academics. No, it is not a lie. Franklin’s excellent rating
has fallen off. With the new report card system, Franklin earned a B in
2012-13, scoring all B’s and a C. [It was actually three B’s and two C’s,
meaning we as a district were dangerously close to a C rating. (http://stateimpact.npr.org/ohio/2013/08/22/2012-13-ohio-school-district-report-cards/#table)] This is not excellent. By definition, A is
excellent. There is room for improvement. [In addition, I have been asked to
provide further proof that Franklin has fallen off in academic performance over
the last few years. According to stateimpact.npr.org, it has been awhile since
Franklin City Schools has had the “Excellent” rating it boasts about. Going
back to its 2010-11 data, Franklin was rated “Effective”, as it was the
following year before the new criteria was implemented.] Again many will bring
up, “This is why we need a levy.” But before a levy was conceived, this performance
was evaluated. It is not a need for new funds, but a mishandling of current
funds. I am not against athletics. I am a Sports Business major. My current
plan is to make a living off of athletics. I enjoy any sport, and participated
in marching band and soccer in high school. But we must be clear about what the
goal of an educational institution is. When push comes to shove, academics must
takes precedence. What is the point of having a student body who can compete on
the field or court if they cannot compete in college applications or once they
get to college? Franklin is all about athletics, and I love sports. But how
many people from Franklin have made a career of being a professional athlete?
One. Frank Lickliter II, who lives in Florida now. The rest of the thousands of
graduates must (at least this is the goal) make a living working in another
field. What is most important?
Apparently,
football, basketball, and baseball are. The lopsided amount of attention paid
to these sports, specifically the former two, was obvious to me and countless
others. I am a football and basketball fan. I played pee-wee football here and
enjoyed many football and basketball games. But due to them being the
income-generating and popular sports, they received the special treatment. They
received new uniforms twice before other sports received them once. (I watched
this happen with these teams contrasted with the soccer team, for one example.)
They often received their extra gear complimentary while others had to pay, and
received much more of it. When special events happened, it was these sports
that were the center of attention. I am not bitter about this; I understand the
culture of the city. If the school were a business this would make complete
sense. But it is not a business, it is a school, where all athletes should be
treated equally. Even if this may not happen in the community or by other
students, the district itself should. But it does not. When the position of
soccer coach was vacated, there was no search. The candidate that applied was
chosen, and that was that. Little thought is given to “minor” sports. Could
this be why sports such as soccer, swimming, volleyball, and tennis have failed
to see much success in recent years? Yet football, basketball, and baseball are
always in the running. Where is the fairness? Where is the funding for these
other sports and athletes? But above that, why not put some of the large budget
given to the income-generating sports towards increasing academic success? Why
are we more worried about a job candidate, who has the connections, being able
to coach rather than teach? When my mother was rejected the first time, we
suspected this. When rejected the second time, we asked. “Well, being a coach
is not the reason we are hiring them,” was the response, “but it is certainly
an added benefit.” [A special shortcoming can be seen in this area of 8th
grade social studies, where my mother interviewed. Before the test was done
away with, one teacher’s scores were at a 45% passing rate. He was then
promoted to an easier position at the high school and his position was filled
with, imagine, another coach.] Then it is a wonder we cannot compete with other
districts in academics. The testimony of a student who came from one of the
classrooms was that he [an 8th grade social studies teacher] never
really went over anything, just talked about sports. We need coaches, but more
importantly, we need solid teachers. We are destined for failure from the
beginning if our priorities are incorrect.
There
were many complaints about Governor John Kasich’s school funding plan last
school year. What many either were ignorant of or refused to acknowledge is
that that plan was not final. Still in the works is another billion dollars
going to Ohio school districts. Before Franklin’s school board and supporters
insist upon further funding, should they not see where this funding will go?
What is stopping them? Greed? Lack of research? If Franklin does get more
funding, there are specific things the money needs to go to. The Junior High is
fast approaching 100 years old, and is not in the best condition. Back in my
father’s day (the 1970s) it had a reputation. A new junior high must be in
order. Yes there was a ballot issue to build a new high school and make the
high school the junior high. A junior high does not need the space of the high
school, along with two gyms and an auditorium. Too much work has been put into
the high school. Why should that much extra money, even at a discount, be spent
to build a new high school and rehab the current one into a junior high? Again,
it goes back to greed and wanting to be like other districts that have done the
same. Some in the community want to say we are as good as other communities.
But we are not those communities; we never will be. And I am glad we are not.
We are Franklin, and we must be realistic with funding.
[I
feel it is worth noting as well the drug problem that has developed over the
years at the high school, and even the junior high. A few students were
arrested for dealing or purchasing drugs this past school year, and
administration played it off as an isolated event. Ask any Franklin High School
student- that was not an isolated event. Two people I graduated with have died
over the past year. One was heavily addicted and experimenting with various
drugs; the other died of an overdose. It is a rampant problem, one that having
a resource officer could curb. But a resource officer was removed a number of
years back, and, despite further funding, was not added back.]
I
have put myself into my community for the extent of my life thus far. I have
been successful so far, in part, due to it. I wish nothing but the best for
Franklin schools and wish to see us compete, yes, in athletics, but more so in
the area of academics, as I have seen with the test scores of several of those
in the graduating class behind me. There are truly great minds in the upcoming
generation of this district, but some are being limited by the practices of a
few self-interested individuals. I am thankful for the many teachers I have had
that have helped me to unlock my potential. I do not “not care about the kids”.
I am not “stupid” or “ignorant”; in fact, looking at GPA and test scores,
without the slightest bit of conceit or pride, I am likely smarter than you. I
am however, observant. To a scary degree. And with what I have seen, I cannot,
in good conscience, vote in the affirmative for any levy of Franklin City
Schools under its current situation and the way it is managed. Drop me from
Facebook- it’s already happened, as it has happened many times before. [And it
happened for several people after this essays’ initial publication.] How dare
anyone stand up for their beliefs in a credible way instead of whining and
making sweeping generalizations. But I could no longer stand by and keep silent
as so many were wrongly accused by people who misunderstood them or simply do
not care about them- especially when it is the accusers’ side that is so boldly
in the wrong. Perhaps I have opened eyes. Doubtless I have made people angry.
But when the truth is revealed, anger is so often an unfortunate but realistic
side effect. If the school board and those on down would implement these
recommendations, I would happily vote for a reasonable tax increase. We may find
that one isn’t necessary. Maybe I’m just part of a rare group that refuses to
accept corruption. A more likely situation is that “cuts that hurt” will be
implemented and voters, who will be blamed for these cuts that could have been
made in other places, will cave and vote for the levy. [Again, I called it.]
But when this time comes, know that I will be, with pride in my community,
still be voting no. Because it is for this very pride that makes me want to see
things changed.
No comments:
Post a Comment